Hi all, here's a tale of woe I need to get off my chest as I can't speak to anyone at eUKhost.
We had a site built on DNN on a Virtuzzo W-VPS.
It fell over a few times due to the old NPP problem, but as I didn't dev the site I was reticent to have it moved to HyperV in case it broke something I couldn't fix.
Last week the site fell over 3 times in a few hours. After 4 or 5 hours of me complaining (and the snottiest "help" i've ever had the displeasure of being given - "not our problem, we built it on an unstable platform but won't support it, so I'll ignore your questions & try to wind you up even more") I was eventually offered three choices - move to HyperV now as we can't keep that node up, transfer it to a more stable node on the same platform, or keep ringing us to have the main node restarted.
Obviously I went with the 2nd option.
Got a reply to my ticket, the new server was online and working fine...
Except it wasn't.
For some reason a load of files (mainly the ASP folders) were corrupt and 0kb
A senior admin tried to reinstall ASP, which didn't work.
He tried to uninstall ASP, which wouldn't work.
He tried to delete the files manually, which wouldn't work.
Eventually I was told that the server was corrupt and that I would have to move to HyperV right now, the data and SQL db would be moved over.
This was done but still the site wouldn't come back up, which we're still working on.
Naturally I asked for the backup of the old "pre-move" site to be restored over the corrupt one.
Apparently these were deleted when it was moved to a new node. Seriously? Migrating the server to a new node, and not waiting to see if the site worked before deleting any working backups?! Okay...
So here we are. Day 6 with no website. No working backups were kept before carrying out a major change, no-one tested the migration (apparently as no-one had an Admin password, but went ahead anyway), I've no way to properly dump the SQL db out of the old server as SQL Manager relies on ASP... which is corrupt, and we're looking at days more downtime while the expensive webdevs consider their options and probably end up rebuilding the site from scratch.
My offsite FTP dumps of the SQL db & site fell over weeks ago as did the service that sent me an email if the FTP backups failed, so I don't have much here that can help.
Stupidly I relied on the site not getting corrupt and my hosts properly backing things up before making any changes to my server, and not replacing it on the weekly Saturday general backup.
What do I have to show for it? I'm halfway through a term for a server which I'm told isn't really supported, we spent thousands with a webdev creating a multilingual DNN site that has been pretty much destroyed and will have to be paid for again, I've lost 4 days work (and my weekend), and all I seem to get from the chat window and ticket system is that it's my fault for requesting to be on a node that didn't fall over every 10 minutes.
Not to say I don't appreciate the work the senior admins are doing trying to help, but something should have been in place for exactly this type of thing. You knew full well that when I renewed earlier this year that the Virtuozzo was unstable, and still happily took money for it, but what procedures were in place for the inevitable migration? Hundreds of these must have been performed, am I to believe that I'm the first to get a corrupt one so nothing was in place to allow for such a thing?
If anyone from the company (other than the poor admins trying to fix this) would like to contact me with an explanation, I'd really appreciate it.


Reply With Quote