Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1
    LiberMan's Avatar
    LiberMan is offline new member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3

    Arrow Okay, so, what am I doing wrong?

    So, I've designed my pages for humans and not for search engines. My web site hosting architecture is a bit complex, but every page is within three clicks of the home page and I have no hidden or tricky links. While my HTML is messy (an artifact of the editor I'm using), it does validate. I'm not knowingly using any Search Engine Spam techniques; the keywords in my meta tags are all relevant to the content. I generate new sitemaps twice a month and upload them to Google religiously. My web site hosting is not static; I try to add new content at least once a week. Finally, my content is by and large unique; so far I haven't found a single web site hosting out there doing what I'm doing on anything close to the same scale I am, even though I'm still less than halfway to where I want to be eventually.

    And still, Google doesn't seem to know that I exist.

    Oh, my main page is indexed; you can google on my website hosting title and the home page comes up. But, so far, none of the primary content (the timetables) seems to be indexed. Using Google's webmaster tools to check my website hosting, only three pages (out of 5 even show up at all and one is a test page which has long since been relocated. And while one timetable does show as being indexed, a google on "timetable Mobile Noxapater" (which should show a hit) returns just nine results, none of which are in any way associated with my website hosting.

    Back when I was working out the kinks in my CSS formatting (with the kind help of the members of this forum), the test page did show up on Google's list and in fact, according to my web logs, I got several hits on it as the result of Google searches. But for the past two months--nada. Yahoo is showing several of my pages, as is MSN, but so far I have almost completely managed to elude Google's notice.

    I'm not going to obsess over my page rank; as I said, my content is unique enough that it should make a strong showing in any suitably targeted search. But if it's not in their index at all--then what do I do?

    Standing by for suggestions, I am...

  2. #2
    paul's Avatar
    paul is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    In my view use of Sitemaps seems here in your case redundant, there are few downside of XML sitemaps like it may have scraping vulnerability, In my opinion in such case I would prefer stop using it and concentrate more on getting quality inbound links and keyword optimization part.
    Last edited by paul; 28-01-2008 at 14:57.

  3. #3
    daxianjin is offline new member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Paul has made a point

  4. #4
    mobile_walls is offline new member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Walls
    Posts
    6

    Default

    It is most probably not import that your HTML is messy for search engines but what count is On-site and Off-site optimization.
    And you have probably fail there. Search engines does not like dynamical pages,...they do not like for example this kind of dynamic extensions .php?adfujkfsdlk;lesdfk
    Try to do some research to chose right words into your title and body and then look around for your competition that score well on search engines.
    Send email to webmaster and ask him if he can place link back to your site, try to write some article and place link to your web site hosting into article, try to write news about your web site hosting and submit it to news website hosting etc...
    They are many technique that will help you. Start with reading some SEO article and then start with working. And be patience. The positive results will come for sure.

  5. #5
    DPS Computing's Avatar
    DPS Computing is offline Voluntary Moderator and Customer of eUKhost
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,418

    Default

    If there is one word of advice I can give you I would say avoid sitemaps at all costs.

    They are spammers / harvestors / hackers dreams and basically gives them the blueprints to your web site hosting which in turn leads them to spam each and every single e-mail address you have as well as find potential vulnerability to launch and attack or abuse your services.
    David Smith
    DPS Computing
    http://www.dpscomputing.com (Computing, Reviews, News) - We're still plodding on adding new content and features (August 2011)
    http://www.djdavid.co.uk - Massive update! (September 2011) - It's now not neglected!!
    http://davidsmith.dpscomputing.com (My Personal Website) - New Site (10/2009)

  6. #6
    sb123 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    355

    Default

    Hi!

    Ref: Your links at the bottom of your post: [Garden Ornaments] [SEO Forum]
    does these 2 sites:
    grandi*llusi*ons.*co*.u*k (age: 7-1/2 years) Homepage PR 4
    and
    cl*icks*.*ws (age: 8 months) Homepage PR 4 & /forum PR 3
    belong to you? (Please remove the asterisks)

    If they do, then you already know the answers to your questions, because the second web site hosting is an Internet Marketing & SEO forum! That's a great achievement -- PR 4 and 3 in less than 8 months -- age: June 30, 2007!!!

    Obviously, these 2 sites are well-off in SEO. If you're speaking of a different site, then most probably you have the answer to the problems to that too (with almost 7-1/2 years web experience, if I am not mistaken!)

    If I may ask, what's the name of this new web site hosting where Google is ignoring you?
    Last edited by sb123; 12-02-2008 at 09:56.


  7. #7
    treepeas's Avatar
    treepeas is offline new member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Should I not put a web site hosting map on my page so? Most search engines say that they are useful for indexing?

  8. #8
    paul's Avatar
    paul is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Using sitemap might be good for News sites because their content changes more often, even for blog I think just pinging is enough.

  9. #9
    Arbie is offline new member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default Sitemaps

    I have read a couple of comments here that say that sitemaps should be avoided.

    This is great news - for your competitors.

    'Scraping and spammers dream' because they can find all your emails - this is not advice, this is simply avoiding the effective methods of hiding your email address and still making them accessible to users. Use mailto: links and it is irrelevant whether or not you have a sitemap - you email will be spammed anyway. Use PHP forms and you'll virtually eliminate this type of spam AND you'll make it a more enjoyable communication for your users.

    Scraping doesn't need a sitemap. There are freely available tools on the internet that will easily download the entire website hosting (including css, html, php and images). Sitemaps simply do not make it easier for scrapers.

    Sitemaps DO provide deep linking to your website hosting. Every link - no matter where it is in the web site hosting - is linked on the first page of an XML sitemap. Google spiders love sitemaps and all the sites that I have have a sitemap. Most have over 80% of the pages in the google index.

    If you use a combination of sitemaps and pinging then you'll always be informing the key search engines that there is content worth a look. Add in to the mix an effective robots.txt and you can control the indexing of pages you don't want indexing whilst still giving ready access to the useful content.

    I am more than happy for anyone to delete their sitemaps or in fact never create them - makes my online promotion in your space much easier.

  10. #10
    paul's Avatar
    paul is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Well, overall what I see the sitemap is a supplementary tools and do not replace the existing crawl based mechanisms which a search engine follow, however if a webmaster using rich AJAX or Flash, they may help crawlers to discover the website hosting otherwise still I think it is time consuming and not necessary.
    Last edited by paul; 03-06-2008 at 12:20.

  11. #11
    Arbie is offline new member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default :)

    Because you do not see the value - you haven't realised that you can automate it. Additionally, this has nothing to do with replacing the crawls (you can't) it simply makes them more effective. That is why I can get new pages into the google index in a couple of days max...

    I only set it up once and then any and all future changes are automatically updated and Google, Yahoo, and MSN are all notified that there is an updated sitemap (I also have semi-automated robots.txt....)

  12. #12
    freeflyer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberMan View Post
    So, I've designed my pages for humans and not for search engines. My web site hosting architecture is a bit complex, but every page is within three clicks of the home page and I have no hidden or tricky links. While my HTML is messy (an artifact of the editor I'm using), it does validate. I'm not knowingly using any Search Engine Spam techniques; the keywords in my meta tags are all relevant to the content. I generate new sitemaps twice a month and upload them to Google religiously. My web site hosting is not static; I try to add new content at least once a week. Finally, my content is by and large unique; so far I haven't found a single web site hosting out there doing what I'm doing on anything close to the same scale I am, even though I'm still less than halfway to where I want to be eventually.

    And still, Google doesn't seem to know that I exist.

    Oh, my main page is indexed; you can google on my website hosting title and the home page comes up. But, so far, none of the primary content (the timetables) seems to be indexed. Using Google's webmaster tools to check my website hosting, only three pages (out of 5 even show up at all and one is a test page which has long since been relocated. And while one timetable does show as being indexed, a google on "timetable Mobile Noxapater" (which should show a hit) returns just nine results, none of which are in any way associated with my website hosting.

    Back when I was working out the kinks in my CSS formatting (with the kind help of the members of this forum), the test page did show up on Google's list and in fact, according to my web logs, I got several hits on it as the result of Google searches. But for the past two months--nada. Yahoo is showing several of my pages, as is MSN, but so far I have almost completely managed to elude Google's notice.

    I'm not going to obsess over my page rank; as I said, my content is unique enough that it should make a strong showing in any suitably targeted search. But if it's not in their index at all--then what do I do?

    Standing by for suggestions, I am...
    what you're doing wrong is nothing, unfortunately though what you're doing right is very little.

    You've done about 5% of what you need for onsite Search Engine Optimization. How competitive is your term/s? How many of your pages are actually indexed (as opposed to how many are returned in the serps). How's your nav and internal linking? Have you checked for duplicates?

    First off do a site:www check on google and see what comes up (dont forget to check the supplemental 'results we havent included'), then make sure you have no duplicated pages arising from things like wildcards in the url (normally happens a lot with dynamic content, especially on e-commerce sites).

    Theres sooooooo much more you can do yet, so dont panic..
    Last edited by freeflyer; 04-06-2008 at 07:29.

  13. #13
    paul's Avatar
    paul is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbie View Post
    Because you do not see the value - you haven't realised that you can automate it. Additionally, this has nothing to do with replacing the crawls (you can't) it simply makes them more effective. That is why I can get new pages into the google index in a couple of days max...

    I only set it up once and then any and all future changes are automatically updated and Google, Yahoo, and MSN are all notified that there is an updated sitemap (I also have semi-automated robots.txt....)
    That's sound good you're getting nice result using sitemap, however I don't use it and get similar good results which you've mentioned, that is the reason it take me off to use a sitemap.

  14. #14
    freeflyer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    119

    Default

    i dont see any reason not to use sitemaps.. they provide useful information in the webmaster tools as well, ie now many pages are indexed from it etc. Admittedly they dont gaurantee anything, but given the choice betweeen not using them and using them for a clients site, you use them, simple as that. They dont do any harm, but they MAY do some good.

    In the case of MSN, in two cases i've had sites that havent been listed during the normal MSN delay with a new site.. i've created a webmaster tools account for them submitted a sitemap, and next month they were there? coincidence? maybe, but not a coincidence i'd be willing to overlook.

  15. #15
    organics is offline new member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Do you have a "Site Search" feature? If not, I would add one, many search engine appear to like them.

  16. #16
    freeflyer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    119

    Default

    not so sure.. search engines can index web site hosting searches, but they can lead to duplicate pages.

  17. #17
    simpleSimon is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Just keep adding those varied and quality backlinks by posting unique content to web 2.0 sites for example like Squidoo, Hubpages, Wetpain, Quizilla etc. obviously with a one way link back to your site.
    I'm currently building my family history tree using the best genealogy software I could find.

  18. #18
    freeflyer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    119

    Default

    well, at least there was some attempt there to disguise your reason for being here simon.. a bit more effort than the normal spammers anyway. And an attempt at a deep link too !! commendable

  19. #19
    kelvintrinit's Avatar
    kelvintrinit is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Nashik/Maharashtra/India
    Posts
    16

    Default

    well like everyone said over hea u need to work on your basic seo tactics. n complicated coding does not interest search engines. also sitemap is important so you are doing well in that area. And as some of them have mentioned you need to see into your onsite and off site optimisation try social networking sites like facebook or orkut, myspace make frnds and share links with them it will certainly give a boost to your traffic, ofcourse you cant ignore one way links cause thats wht makes search engine feel your site is important.

  20. #20
    teeshirts is offline new member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Kelvin all of us know that there are 100 plus factors contributing in the SEO. How to get the traffic for your site is one of the major aim behind any Webmaster/ or Business owner. Since we know that 75% of the internet marketing is done via the Google and remaining 25% is done via the other ways. For that purpose SEO is the big strategy for doing the marketing. You can't even ignore a single point which can get some juice for your site while doing SEO.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0