
Originally Posted by
flesso
...Millions have companies have used it for a long time with no problems.
Ah, the power of overstatement! Rubbish!

If that were true of this single, solitary company in whose forum we debate, why then would I have been driven towards a stable solution after the abject failure of two completely separate VPS Hosting nodes to give me reliable uptime and performance? The first ended up with a thrashed, then trashed HDD (well-documented VPS Hosting weakness); the second was seemingly occupied by disruptive and bandwidth-hungry third parties over which I had NO control but from which I suffered far too often, however there were far more problems than just that, some of which were attributable to OpenVZ (in hindsight)! All disappeared after moving to a dedicated server; one without 'wallies' and virtual machines — what conclusion would you draw from that?
I think the objective answer Josh is probably that your use of a VPS Hosting bears no comparison to mine, nor having seen in detail what Paul uses, his either — we have reseller and user accounts in abundance for one thing and I think your needs are more modest? Neither Paul nor I overloaded our VPS Hostings in an easily identifiable way yet there were problems that left us with unsatisfied customers — that's the worst aspect ...
Paul has just been advised by eUK-Martin in another thread that his VPS Hosting is now in need of an upgrade and I believe he would be better not to be hosting on a VPS Hosting, based upon my own experience, as the potential pitfalls remain even when you upgrade — caveat emptor!
Gadge
Too many nice toys — too little time to play with 'em!